Editorial policy

What I write about

I focus on stories that matter to people navigating the dark web—whether you're a researcher, journalist, privacy advocate, or simply curious. Topics range from anonymity tools and operational security to marketplace investigations and emerging threats. I don't chase sensationalism. If a story doesn't help you understand how the dark web works or how to stay safe, it doesn't make the cut.

Each piece starts with a question I'd want answered myself. I prioritise practical guides over abstract theory, and I update older articles when technology shifts or new vulnerabilities surface.

Where facts come from

I verify everything before publishing. Primary sources include direct testing of software, analysis of public dark web forums, and documentation from developers. When I reference marketplaces or services, I've either accessed them through Tor or cross-checked reports from multiple independent researchers.

Secondary sources—academic papers, security bulletins, law enforcement disclosures—get cited with full context. I don't rely on a single news outlet or second-hand claims. If I can't confirm a fact through at least two credible channels, I label it as unverified or leave it out entirely.

Technical claims go through my own lab setup. I test VPNs, encryption tools, and privacy configurations on isolated machines before recommending them to you.

Affiliate links and advertising

When I link to a VPN provider, security tool, or hosting service that pays a commission, I mark it clearly with "affiliate link" or a disclosure at the top of the article. You'll never see hidden partnerships or undisclosed sponsorships here.

I only recommend products I've tested personally. Money doesn't influence my verdict—if a service performs poorly or compromises your privacy, I'll say so regardless of any affiliate programme. Advertising, if it appears, will be labelled and separated from editorial content.

Corrections and updates

Mistakes happen. When I spot an error—or when you point one out—I correct it immediately and add a note at the bottom of the article with the date and nature of the change. I don't silently edit or delete inconvenient details.

Technology moves fast, especially in the dark web space. I review high-traffic guides every six months and flag outdated information at the top if a tool has been compromised, deprecated, or replaced. Major updates get a revision date in the metadata.

What I don't promise

I'm not a lawyer, and nothing here constitutes legal advice. Laws around Tor, encryption, and dark web access vary wildly by jurisdiction—consult a qualified attorney if you're unsure about your local regulations.

I don't guarantee your anonymity or security. Every guide reflects best practices as I understand them, but threat models differ. What works for a journalist in Seattle might not suit a whistleblower in a hostile state.

I don't endorse illegal activity. ObscuraNet exists to educate, not to facilitate crime. If you use this information to break the law, that's on you.

Spotted something wrong?

Email me directly at [email protected]. Include the article URL and a clear description of the issue. I read every message and respond within 48 hours.